Whereas the foundation for perisno just felt a bit weak in comparison. And it also felt like it stood on something solid. And i feel that while both of them are similar they also have a lot of things seperating the two, pendor felt more "finished" in a way. To conclude, i feel that pendor is the better mod.
I cannot recall if Perisno has custom music but if it does im sure that is also fantastic. The music in pendor is also just bloody brilliant, it is the only mod that i play with in game music on since it is just that good. Pendor also has the feel of urgency, for me at least since if you dont get strong bandits/heretics/cultists/jatu are going to run rampant over all of the lands making things very difficult for you. But in Perisno it felt like it was the army in general that was the issue. Pendors seems more focused on individuals, plenty of times there have been fights where i have ended upp face to face versus a knight or so and it felt like i was outmatched, i knew who my enemy was and i was not invincible. And i think that pendors difficulty varies a lot from Perisno's. The lore of pendor is also something that i appreciate more. I havent reached proper lategame in Perisno so i cannot properly compare that. I am also in love with pendors lategame with building a knighthood order and such, or even just joining one itself. I guess i would call Perisno's artstyle to be too "grand" whereas i prefer pendors (mostly) more solid look. For one it is the aesthetics (is that how you spell it idk) in pendor just seem to match so much more than what they do in perisno. For me something just clicked with pendor that didnt with perisno. I think i have spent around 800 hours in PoP, around 25 or so in Perisno.
0 kommentar(er)
